Sunday, February 22, 2009
Response to "Scientists respond to Gore's Warnings of Climate Catastrophe"
In the argument over global warming, it seems to me that the opposing side has the stronger argument. After reading Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" and then the scientists response, I have concluded that the scientist analysis of global warming is more accurate and better developed than Gore's. Not to say that the former vice-president has not made a valiant effort. I wish more public figures would do more to promote better types of energy sources. Then maybe people would actually start listening. However for his argument to be more convincing, he would need to incorporate more credible sources and more accurate information.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment